In a Friday followup, Galloway pointed out that other Republicans — namely Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson — actually praised the administration’s response to the flood as “magnificent” and “quick.”

So how did Galloway square all that praise from Georgia’s two Republican senators with his earlier contention that the feds’ response amounted to “Shades of Katrina”?

Easy. He just blamed his source. “There’s no echo,” he wrote of Chambliss and Isakson, “of the frustration expressed by Cobb County Commission Chairman Sam Olens on Thursday, about the days it took to get official federal attention.”

Galloway failed to note, however, that the “Katrina” analogy didn’t come from Olens. It was in Galloway’s own headline. Unless … wow … has the AJCbecome so conservative that Republican politicians are now writing its headlines?

Related posts:

1. AJC likens feds’ flood response to Katrina Here’s an AJC headline that borders on tasteless. It at...
2. Let’s balance the budget by raising taxes on working people! Here’s another story to remind us how far the political/media...
3. See Isakson on health care this week [caption id="attachment_1724" align="alignleft" width="244" caption="U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson (left) with...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Barely a day-and-a-half after Gov. Perdue asked President Obama to declare parts of north Georgia a natural disaster area, one local politician — a guy who happens to be running for statewide office — gripes to Jim Galloway, the paper’s political blogger, that the president’s taking too long.

Galloway’s headline? “Shades of Katrina: A frustrated Sam Olens wonders if Washington knows how badly metro Atlanta is hurting.”

Whoa, now, Jim. Doncha think that’s a tad melodramatic?

Not to belittle the North Georgia flood at all — at least nine people died in this week’s disaster. But we are not going through anything like Hurricane Katrina; this is not something that requires massive National Guard mobilization. And FEMA’s response to it has not been a you’re-doing-a-heckuva-job-Brownie moment.

Taking less than two days to declare a disaster in counties hit by a bad flood appears to be slightly on the fast side for FEMA . It’s important to recognize that this aide isn’t about urgently airlifting people off their roofs or other such Katrina-esque measures; it mainly goes toward household reimbursements and debris cleanup.

To get a comparison, I did a quick web search on a few of the 48 floods that FEMA has declared a disaster zone over the past couple of years. Most appeared to have taken more than two days to be declared, and it didn’t seem matter whether Bush or Obama was in the White House. The closest comparison I could find was a 2007 flood in Minnesota that cost seven lives. President Bush granted federal disaster status four days after the floods and three days after the request.

It’s not unusual for politicians to try to score political points off disasters, though it reeks of cheese when the complaint is baseless. Cobb Commission Chairman Sam Olens is running for the Republican nomination for attorney general, so he certainly has something to gain by getting media attention for public fulmination about Obama. That’s a relevant point that Galloway neglects to mention.

He also fails to let his own readers in on something his own paper reported: Obama immediately responded to Gov. Perdue’s request for aid by calling the governor personally Tuesday night after his speech before the UN to assure him of a prompt disaster decision.

Related posts:

1. AJC’s Galloway disavows self — sort of Last week, I noted that AJC political blogger Jim Galloway...
2. Flood of ‘09 is No. 1! At least, in some watersheds Flood records fell following this fall’s frightening rainfall, according a...
3. Let’s balance the budget by raising taxes on working people! Here’s another story to remind us how far the political/media...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The discrepancy may partly be due to the surprise announcement by Baker, the centrist attorney general for whom political risk truly is a four-letter word. Porter, the state House minority leader, had tipped his hat before throwing it into the ring.

It also makes sense for Poythress (and for that matter Porter) to keep the powder dry against Baker because white candidates don’t want to turn off black voters by attacking the only African-American in the primary. Contrast that to the dynamic between Poythress and Porter, an attorney and newspaper publisher from Dublin with a folksy way about him who will compete for Poythress’ logical base of white, rural, moderate Democrats.

So there’s a certain logic to Poythress going over the top by accusing Porter of “an unforgivable offense” for failing to recruit enough state House candidates last year. Just five days earlier, Poythress uttered nary a nasty word about Baker’s hardy defense of the state voter ID law, which Republicans enacted to make it more difficult for Democratic constituencies to get to the polls.

In his announcement, Porter focused on an issue that may prove a point of for Republican vulnerability: The utter failure of the GOP to deal with  metro Atlanta’s transportation problems. The money line: “This year’s lack of leadership on transportation and personal grabs for power at the expense of the people convinced me to throw my hat into the ring.” (Never mind that Porter had already told people he’d intended to run before this year’s legislative session even began.)

Baker won’t make it out of the primary without taking his own hits from Democratic constituencies. He’s vulnerable among his base of black voters for appealing a ruling that would have hastened the freedom of teenage cause celebre Genarlow Wilson, as well as for his support of a bunch of tough cirminal sentencing measures. But don’t expect open attacks on Baker from his opponents: White candidates want to be in a position to snatch up black votes rather than to dirty their hands in the process of prying the votes from Baker.

The dynamic for the Democratic primary changes entirely, of course, if former Gov. Roy Barnes decides to enter the race — as he’s supposedly considering. For now, however, Baker and Porter seem the guys to beat: Baker’s already won three statewide races as attorney general and, despite his record, should get the lion’s share African-American support. Porter’s network among state legislators, lawyers and newspaper people should make him pretty formidable.

Poythress — who’s served off-and-on in various state offices for three decades —seems the odd man out to me, but then again I’ve never quite gotten his candidacy. He’s been running since the Ice Age  (well, actually, early last year), and during that time he’s patiently spoken to small groups across the state. But doesn’t he seem a bit too yesterday to lead a Democratic Party revival in 2010? For instance, three of the endorsers listed on his website have the word “former” in front of their titles.

On the Republican side, Lieutenant Gov. Casey Cagle, Secretary of State Karen Handel, Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine and state Rep. Austin Scott are already running, while Cobb County Commission Chairman Sam Olens is thinking about it.

Here’s more of Poythress’ attack on Porter:

In his statement Dubose Porter said, ‘ … we must look past the primary and honestly ask who can win a general election.’

It’s ironic he led with this thought when Dubose Porter, as House Minority Leader, is the Democrat who seconded the nomination of Republican Glenn Richardson to become Speaker of the House. He also left 81 House Republicans uncontested in the 2008 elections by not recruiting Democratic challengers. This is an unforgivable offense given the tremendous turnout and historic year for Democrats. And Dubose should tread lightly when talking about his alleged General Election viability especially since Republicans would have a field day over his 26 year voting record in the General Assembly.

And here’s Porter’s full announcement:

After this year’s failure to pass a transportation funding bill by the Republican leadership it has become apparent that if Georgia is to move forward there will have to be a new vision coming from the Governor’s office. Smaller government is good, but not when its goal is to dismantle transportation, law enforcement, and education. These are vital services that must be maintained if Georgia is to move forward with America.

The Governor and his leadership team have used this economic downturn as an excuse to dismantle these fundamental programs; programs on which our entire economy rests. This session we sponsored HB 356 which offered up a way to find an expected $1 billion in uncollected revenue without raising taxes a dime. HB 356 would have implemented a new point of sales policy exactly like Alabama. This Governor and his leadership in the House and Senate chose to turn this money down because it would have funded a lot of the programs they chose to cut. Programs our citizens needed.

The Governor and this leadership were cutting the funding to the QBE funding formula, which goes to our schools, and law enforcement when we had money and now they have added transportation to their list. “This year’s lack of leadership on transportation and their personal grabs for power at the expense of the people convinced me to throw my hat into the ring.”

It is obvious that reduced law enforcement is not a way to grow quality of life, and access to a quality basic education is vital to positive growth. In the immediate future we see job opportunity through services and technology. Our people will have to be able to meet the requirements for these jobs. They also will not be keeping the same job for life, but will have to be able to retrain quickly. Without adequate educational opportunity that will not be possible.

Transportation is another foundation service for government and is a key to a prosperous future. We don’t need to cut MARTA rail to the airport. We need to extend it. The message cutting MARTA, when the money is there, sends potentially damaging signals to future investors in Georgia. We have to start thinking of the future.

My youngest sons, the twins, are now freshmen at UGA and it seems as if this session’s lack of leadership has coincided correctly with my timing for running for state wide office.

I realize a Democrat will have a hard time in what is seen as a red state. However I believe Georgia will look at the issues and if they find a candidate that represents their core values they will be willing to vote for a change in the Governor’s office. My work on the issues will carry me in Atlanta, but according to the pundits from the far right to the far left, it will take a candidate with my core values to connect with those outside of Atlanta.

My district, Laurens and a small part of Johnson County, closely resembles the demographics of the state as a whole. In my last race I won by 76% over a Republican candidate who was a 10-year city council member and a vice president of a bank. I was able to do that because I listen to my people. My t-shirts always read, “DuBose Porter works for me,” because I never forget who sent me. The title is ‘Representative.’ I represent. I listen well. I bring all the people to the table. I learn as much as I can on the topic from all sides and then lead. I remember my Scout Oath. I bring in my faith. I think of the Georgia I want my four sons to live in and I remember our state motto of wisdom, justice and moderation. Listen. Learn. Lead. You aren’t constantly in the press with that style, but it works best to move projects forward if you can lose the ego and share the credit.

Related posts:

1. Barnes may decide soon Roy Barnes is expected to determine within "3-4 weeks" whether...
2. Governor’s race taking shape Maybe it says something about how next year's governor's race...
3. Poythress hits Republican “secession candidates” [caption id="attachment_748" align="alignleft" width="240" caption="GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE DAVID POYTHRESS: See his...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.